Friday, 17 December 2010

Feather de-pigmentation in Carrion Crow

I had to drop the car off at the garage this morning - the windscreen washer motor has gone, which is not too clever at this time of year. Never mind, life is just a stream of birding opportunities, and I set off walking home on foot with my SLR over my shoulder. Within minutes a dozen or so Waxwings had appeared, though too brief and distant for pictures. In addition, six Tree Sparrows at the entrance to Blackford Glen tripled my highest previous count for this area. These birds along with Fieldfares and Bramblings in this suburban setting, provided further evidence of the effects of hard weather movements in response to the bitterly cold northerly airflow we have just experienced.

A Carrion Crow was feeding at the road side. True to form and notwithstanding the severity of the weather, it was instantly spooked by the sight of a human showing any interest in itself, so it hurried off. As it flew it revealed that it was one of those crows that have white patches of feathering in the wings.

This form of plumage occurs regularly in Carrion Crows and birds like these feature regularly in on-line identification forums such as Bird Form. In fact, by strange coincidence one appeared there today (referring to the American Crow, but the plumage aberration is one and the same). Admittedly it can be quite an exciting plumage variation, especially when it forms a full double white bar across all of the flight feathers. I saw a double white wing-barred crow when I was at school in the 1980s and sincerely thought I had stumbled upon something very rare indeed...

Usually this plumage in crows is described as leucism, a term that is used widely for plumage lacking in, or reduced in, pigmentation. The Oystercatcher on the right (photographed at Musselburgh Lagoons, East Lothian, 26 May 2009), for example, shows much reduction in its melanin pigments with the black feathers replaced by a mixture of white and fawn plumage.

Melanin adds to the strength of the feather structure. As a result black feathers are more resistant to wear (and maybe bacterial degradation) compared to white feathers. This additional strength afforded by the dark melanin pigments possibly explains the regular occurence of black wingtips in many different species of birds. Conversely, as the less resistant pale fringes of many feathers are worn away, the appearance of a bird's plumage may change without the need to moult. Certainly, the paler patches of these odd Carrion Crow's plumage often appear to be suffering heavily from the effects of abrasion.


However, I do not think that these areas of feather de-pigmentation have the same origin as either the overall leucism shown in the Oystercatcher above or in the individual white feathers that show up regularly in species sucha s the Blackbird. These aberrations are likely to be due to the switching on or off of particular genes in the cells responsible for feather development. Instead, in the crows it is likely that this plumage aberration is a symptom of a dietary deficiency. The scarcity or absence of a particular nutrient, or precursor substrate, is preventing sufficient successful completion of the metabolic pathway generating melanin. The tail of the Carrion Crow pictured above certainly appears to show growth bars that indicate some variability in health or dietary status during the period those tail feathers were grown (given the uniformity of the bar, presumably this is a 1CY bird that grew all of these feathers at the same time?).


So what evidence is there that this plumage aberration may be the result of a dietary deficiency:

Calcium deficiency is cited as being the cause of this plumage by at least some bird rescue centres (and here). Crows that are severely affected by this condition grow normal plumage at their next moult once given an appropriate diet. Whether there is evidence for the deficiency being due to a lack of calcium is unclear, but this appears to be strong evidence that this plumage aberration has an environmental cause and is not solely under genetic control.

Folic acid deficiency has been found to cause feather de-pigmentation in domestic chickens. The feather producing tissues originate from neural crest cells and folic acid is known to affect neural crest cell differentiation. Of course, crows are distantly related to chickens, so some metabolic pathways may be different, but there is a very strong link between this plumage aberration and environment.

In addition, it is interesting that viral infection can lead to this symmetrical feather depigmentation:

Circovirus infection evidence has been found in Australian Ravens with this these white patches their wings. In this case the feathers also had thickened sheaths which did not allow the correct development and opening out of the feathers. It is possible that our crows are also affected by a similar circovirus and that this is an underlying cause of the white patches we see in our birds. Again, this evidence from Australia strongly supports the idea that an environmental agent can be a key factor in the development of this aberrant plumage.

It is worth noting that there is no evidence that this plumage aberration is a solely inherited characteristic. Instead, it seems reasonable to conclude that it is likely that an environmental factor (e.g. diet or viral agent) is a determining factor influencing whether the correct melanin development occurs in the wing feathers of crows. It may be that feather de-pigmentation is a better term than leucism for this type of aberration, though, of course, it is unlikely to catch on...

Thursday, 16 December 2010

First year Common Gull with barred axillaries

This young Common Gull came into the garden a couple of days ago. I was hoping it was going to be the smoky-tailed individual seen on the 8th December, or even the less smoky-tailed individual seen on the same date, but although it had a reasonably heavily spotted rump it was yet another different individual. This latest bird had a less smoky tail but a nicely broad subterminal tail band and intriguingly barred axillaries (armpits!). I have not seen this feature on any of the other 1CY birds observed so far.



Wednesday, 15 December 2010

Common Gull with leg twisted through tail

This Common Gull, which has visited the garden on a couple of occasions, has a malformed right leg which appears to be twisted around and facing backwards. In flight this leg pierces through the feathers of the tail and this has caused an area of severe feather damage and wear within the tail and coverts.



In plumage the bird resembles a first winter (1CY), apart from a single white adult-type tail feather. 
When on the ground the bird has a more awkward hopping gait but it does appear to be able to feed reasonably well. I'll keep an eye out for it, though given that it has survived the recent severe weather, maybe it is well able to look after itself...

Tuesday, 14 December 2010

Second winter Black-headed Gull

I fired off a couple of shots of an 'adult' Black-headed Gull at lunchtime today. After I looked at the images, I was surprised to see the distinctive black leading edges on primaries 8 and 9, which are indicative of a second winter bird (2CY).

Once upon a time I used to draw and sketch birds. The discipline involved in field sketching seemed to induce a heightened awareness of plumage detail and a keener and more accurate type of observation. In contrast, birding with a camera has possibly reduced my field ability, since the instantaneous record of detail can be achieved without recourse to patient or painstaking observation. Maybe I can stem the tide of my decline though, through the careful examination of images to identify subtle fieldmarks that may, as a result, become increasingly obvious when in the field... I'll find out next time a BhG flies past!

Lumping Lesser, Common and Arctic Redpolls



It has been a five year wait, but, at last, I happened to be outside when a Redpoll (shown below, not above!) decided to visit the garden. There have been several tantalising flyovers in the last few months, but today's bird was already in the birch tree. It was feeding unobtrusively and I only noticed it as I was adding to the compost heap right under the tree. In the ensuing scramble for the camera and contortions to achieve a camera angle I managed to slip on a decomposing Halloween pumpkin. Luckily the bird was settled... I took a series of shots as I established its identity as a Lesser Redpoll. This puts the garden list up to 69 species.


Of course, Redpoll taxonomy and identification is fraught and complex. With that in mind, it should come as no surprise that the closest relatives of the Redpolls are the Crossbills! Like that group subtle structural and morphological differences are used for segregation. In the case of the Redpolls into five (or six) recognisable(ish) forms: the Lesser Redpoll cabaret; the Common/Mealy Redpoll flammea; the North-western/Greenland/Icelandic Redpoll rostrata (often classified within flammea and may or may not include yet another form the very variable islandica which may or may not be shown in the photograph below); the Hoary/Scandinavian Arctic Redpoll exilipes; and Hornemann's Arctic/Greenland Arctic Redpoll hornemanni. And of course, other than 'classic' individuals of each form, many individual birds cannot easily or confidently be placed into one group rather than another.

If you found that paragraph complex then there is some good news. The most recent mtDNA study has found insufficient genetic evidence for the subdivision of the Redpoll group. Instead the evidence indicates that the three species that birders are used to considering at the moment (Lesser Redpoll (cabaret), Common Redpoll (flammea, rostrata, islandica) and Arctic Redpoll (exilipes, hornemanni) should be lumped into one species - presumably: The Redpoll.

Of course variation does exist within the Redpoll. It has been suggested that two well-known factors may be responsible for the variation in form of Redpolls. First, Bergmann's Rule describes the increase of size of individuals of a species with reduced temperatures. Second, Gloger's Rule descibes the increase in darkness of plumage with increase in humidity. So, these two observations would predict that the Redpolls living in western Europe would be darker, those in drier areas (such as in frozen landscapes) would be paler, those in the colder north would be larger and those living further south would be smaller.

So the bird on the left photographed on Fair Isle in October of this year may be a Hornemann's Arctic Redpoll or may be a Redpoll from a population that has evolved in a cold and dry environment.

On the other hand, it has also been suggested that these populations of Redpolls are incipient species that just have not had enough time to build up any significant genetic differences between one another.

Either way, the phenotype variation is real whether it is useful or not in assigning individual birds to genetic groups. So with that in mind, here is a selection of photographs that I took on Fair Isle in October of this year when good numbers of 'Mealy Redpoll' of a variety of plumages were present along with small numbers of 'Lesser Redpoll' and 'Hornemann's Arctic Redpoll'. It is possible that some of the Mealy-types are islandica.



Hornemann's Arctic Redpoll
 





Hornemann's Arctic Redpoll (with Mealy Redpoll)




 
Mealy Redpolls
 







Mealy (left) and Lesser (right) Redpolls, or maybe they are both islandica?





Mealy Redpolls islandica?